I don’t know if i should be surprised, but what Boeing spokeswoman Lori Gunter gives to her best is just stupidity at it’s best. See this Wired article about security considerations in the 787 Dreamliner’s onboard network, which physically connects the passenger network for onboard internet access and the flight network for normal plane operations. Comment by her on this “the wording of the FAA document is misleading, and that the plane’s networks don’t completely connect“. Just one word, but it puts her whole sentence into total studpidity – completely.
My Tweets
- @roblinton won't be able to make it to the private launch of @word_of_pod today. interested though. 3 days ago
- hmpf :-( “@Werner: Nope, not there either :-) RT @wnagele: sydney then :) “@aDB: He didn't. #awssummit”” 3 days ago
- sydney then :) “@aDB: He didn't. #awssummit” 3 days ago
- hint in the architect track on a change to available locations soon. excitement! #awssummit 4 days ago
- haha. @number5 was sitting next to me when i retweeted him. introductions after :) new conference world rules ... 4 days ago
-
My Links
Tags
air france airport amsterdam apple baltimore beach bgwireless boston caida california columbia commons cuwin datcat dcc1 ditl flight frankfurt freifunk fun funkfeuer google holiday internet iphone is4cwn la la jolla las vegas los angeles netherlands orsn party privacy ripe root server san diego san francisco security summit united vienna wireless wireless summit workshop
well, personally I think this is even worse: “There are places where the networks are not touching, and there are places where they are,” she said.
Yes, that’s usually called… connecting two networks, if they are some places where they’re not touching and in some places they are
That’s the real web 2.0 *gg every passenger can control the plane, for example you’ve just decided to go somewhere else? just open the autopilot web interface on 192.168.0.1 and send the plane to the place you want to go